To read this content please select one of the options below:

A synthesis of knowing and governance: making sense of organizational and governance polemics

Bruce Cutting (Bruce Cutting recently retired from the Senior Executive Service in the Australian Commonwealth Department of Finance. He had spent 13 years in finance with some years heading branch responsibilities for promoting the Financial Management Improvement Program (FMIP) in the Commonwealth Government sector. He has degrees in Engineering, Science and Economics and is currently researching a PhD (Management) thesis that has been loosely titled, Improving Governance in Western Society)
Alexander Kouzmin (Alexander Kouzmin currently holds the Chair in Organizational Behaviour at the Cranfield School of Management. Previously he held the Foundation Chair in Management in the Graduate School of Management at the University of Western Sydney, Australia (1991‐2000).)

Corporate Governance

ISSN: 1472-0701

Article publication date: 1 March 2004

1136

Abstract

Where do all the management theories and fads come from? Why are they so different and constantly changing. This paper develops a comprehensive and dynamic cognitive formwork from an understanding of the formulations of Aquinas, Lonergan, Jung, Weber and the Enneagram. The synthesis is new and goes beyond each of the sources to present a more systematic and useable JEWAL synthesis formwork. First, the neo‐platonic hierarchical structure of triadic unity is identified as a particularly pertinent and effective differentiation of reality. Second, whereas the neo‐platonists developed their hierarchical construction of reality from a meta‐physical viewpoint as emanations from the ultimate unity, later philosophers explained the differentiation of consciousness principally by working in the reverse direction. Third, the paper explains the process of learning in terms of the cognitive procession through the layered levels of differentiated consciousness. Fourth, an explanation follows as to how this cognitive formwork can be used to explain a character typology based on the differentiation of consciousness – one that finds expression in a typology commonly known as the Enneagram. Fifth, the JEWAL synthesis formwork is presented as a comprehensive framework in which to understand human governance and social action. More broadly, the paper discusses the significance for the social sciences of achieving such a synthesis of ideas within this new formwork – a synthesis between the Western developed philosophy, which runs through the work of Aquinas, Lonergan, Weber and Jung, and the Eastern physio‐psychological wisdom encapsulated in the Enneagram typology. In conclusion, the paper attempts to bring it all together in an answer to the questions underpinning the paper; namely, what does it mean to know and how do we make sense of those voices that speak out of that knowing.

Keywords

Citation

Cutting, B. and Kouzmin, A. (2004), "A synthesis of knowing and governance: making sense of organizational and governance polemics", Corporate Governance, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 76-114. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700410521989

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2004, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles