The Functional TFLS Living Scale, UK Edition

Citation

Ireland, C.A. and CPsychol (2012), "The Functional TFLS Living Scale, UK Edition", The British Journal of Forensic Practice, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 316-317. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636641211284056

This assessment is designed as a brief measure of performance‐based functional competence for individuals who may suffer from a variety of neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. It assesses important aspects of their self‐care and ability to function independently, focusing on paying bills, remembering instructions over a short‐time period, and performing basic money transactions. It was initially developed through research into Alzheimer's, and where it was regarded to be a more adept assessment of cognitive decline in activities of daily living. Following this initial development, the focus of the instrument expanded to other groups, such as those with intellectual disability, traumatic brain injury and schizophrenia. It therefore, has a much wider remit, and where it can now be utilised with a wide population, from 16 to 90 years, and where an assessment of functional ability is felt to be helpful. It is a brief instrument, taking only 15 minutes to administer.

It does have helpful applicability with the relevant populations, such as assisting in questions of competence and levels of independent living. It is however more suited for community populations, including community forensic populations, as opposed to clients in a secure setting, and where their daily living as assessed by this tool may be more restricted. A strength of this assessment is its focus on the more complex skills required for independent living, and which are more cognitively demanding. It can therefore be considered a robust tool for assessing these more multifaceted components, with a general opinion that it is these components which can first be noted to disintegrate with neurodegenerative disorders, as opposed to the more basic aspects of daily care. As such, there is the potential to identify difficulties much earlier, and to then put in place supportive measures and interventions for the individual. It also moves away from a traditional over‐reliance on the self‐report of others when making a judgement on these skills, and focuses more directly on the observed ability in the client.

Outside of its clinical utility, a further advantage is its accessibility for the client by exploring their competence without potentially evoking a sense of prolonged failure. If a client presents as unsuccessful in some areas they can quickly move to another aspect of self‐care and/or ability. It can further be an engaging assessment, and where the client is requested to demonstrate ability in a range of different ways.

Overall this is a helpful instrument to determine the aspects of complex daily living that an individual can readily undertake, and areas where further support may be needed. It is easily assessable for the examiner, with helpful instructions and reminders as you progress through the instrument. Yet, this is only achieved by the examiner fully familiarising themselves and practicing the administration prior to engaging with a client. A point of observation with this instrument however is the need for the examiner themselves to provide further materials. Whilst these are generally not problematic, there is a need to purchase items such as a timer, a stopwatch and a zip‐top bag. Whilst an examiner can source these, it would be more helpful if these were provided, even at an additional cost. Yet, this should not deter a potential purchaser, as the benefit of using this tool far outweighs such considerations.