To read this content please select one of the options below:

Proposed classification scheme for direct writing technologies

Letizia Mortara (Department of Engineering, Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK)
Jonathan Hughes (Department of Engineering, Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK)
Pallant S. Ramsundar (Department of Engineering, Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK)
Finbarr Livesey (Department of Engineering, Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK)
David R. Probert (Department of Engineering, Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK)

Rapid Prototyping Journal

ISSN: 1355-2546

Article publication date: 31 July 2009

1281

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to propose and discuss a definition and a classification scheme for direct writing (DW) technologies.

Design/methodology/approach

Both the definition and the classification are developed based on the perspectives of the growing DW community in the UK, through consultation with members, workshops and a survey across the community. In addition, current DW technologies and literature on classification techniques are reviewed.

Findings

The classification is structured in order to encompass current technologies, but also to be expandable to accommodate new ones that could be identified in the future as belonging to the DW remit. It is developed considering three dimensions related to DW: “Technology” to encompass all the processes, apparatuses, principles and tools which allow DW manufacturing; “Applications” to consider all the “types of manufactured goods” which could be produced with the DW technologies; and “Materials” which could be employed in DW manufacturing. The classification scheme is visualised into navigation maps and used as the basis of a software tool which can allow the community to exchange information on DW.

Research limitations/implications

The paper proposes a classification as a tool for knowledge exchange and to support knowledge organisation and retrieval. However, the classification proposed in this paper might not be the only possible solution.

Practical implications

The definitional framework is proposed to the DW community as a language tool to help communication among members with different perspectives and to be used to support the creation of information databases. It is embodied in a software tool through which they could file personal profiles (i.e. their expertise and interests) and hence map the community.

Originality/value

It is evident that, due to the heterogeneity of the community of scientists and practitioners interested in these technologies, many perspectives coexisted and that a communication platform is required. The authors decide to develop a classification which could be flexible enough to encompass new emerging technologies as the use of classifications as tools for supporting communication across the scientific community is well known and as the authors could not identify in literature any other DW technology classification which could satisfy these requirements.

Keywords

Citation

Mortara, L., Hughes, J., Ramsundar, P.S., Livesey, F. and Probert, D.R. (2009), "Proposed classification scheme for direct writing technologies", Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 299-309. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540910979811

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles