Analysis of the quality attributes used in establishing best value tenders in the UK social housing sector
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
ISSN: 0969-9988
Article publication date: 4 July 2008
Abstract
Purpose
A number of studies have highlighted the problems and challenges that have been encountered with the analysis of best value and partnering tenders carried out in the UK public sector. One of the principal issues is that client organisations and decision makers have to assess numerous diverse quality attributes as part of the contractor selection process. The purpose of this paper is to present the findings of research, which aimed to identify the core factors, which could be used to differentiate bids in the context of social housing.
Design/methodology/approach
A questionnaire was sent to a cross‐section of stakeholders within the social housing sector asking the respondents to rank the importance of 35 attributes with respect to selecting a successful contractor. The responses were subjected to principal component analysis to detect a structure in the relationship between the attributes and classify the attributes into a set of factors.
Findings
The results indicate that the 35 attributes could be grouped together and reduced to ten core factors.
Practical implications
Application of the results could enable the stakeholders to streamline the tender analysis procedure allowing the high volume of tenders to be dealt with more effectively and efficiently.
Originality/value
It is not expected that client organisations would limit their tender analysis to the ten core factors only. They are not intended to be prescriptive and the paper only provides a starting point in using them in the choice of contractor selection quality attributes.
Keywords
Citation
Phillips, S., Martin, J., Dainty, A. and Price, A. (2008), "Analysis of the quality attributes used in establishing best value tenders in the UK social housing sector", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980810886829
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2008, Emerald Group Publishing Limited