Inequality of discourse: problematic consumption of justice in the common law legal system

Abstract

Examines access to justice, within the Australian context of an adversarial system, from a consumer’s perspective. It is argued that the current system of justice represents the most conservative element of Australian society and that the courtroom discourse structure and the legal professional code of practice do little to ensure access to justice or quality of service. Inequality in communication and in the distribution of wealth, affecting all spheres of social life, especially the legal system, pose major barriers to access to justice. Stemming from these two principal barriers to equality in access to justice, a multitude of other barriers are perceived to exist. These perceived barriers are magnified by various platforms of social and political analysis as well as historical, contextual factors and administrative action. Attention is drawn to the emerging need for a continuous alignment of administrative and justice systems with democratic justice principles and global social changes.

Citation

Korac‐Kakabadse, N., Kouzmin, A. and Reeves Knyght, P. (2001), "Inequality of discourse: problematic consumption of justice in the common law legal system", Women in Management Review, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 126-141. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420110390282