To read this content please select one of the options below:

Methodological themes: Back to the drawing board: revisiting grounded theory and the everyday accountant’s and manager’s reality

Lee D. Parker (University of Adelaide, South Australia)
Bet H. Roffey (Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia)

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

ISSN: 0951-3574

Article publication date: 1 May 1997

4824

Abstract

Restates the case for accounting and management research from a grounded theory perspective, and advocates its informed and more frequent application. Examines the intellectual foundations and key tenets of grounded theory in the context of researchers’ theoretical assumptions and methodological characteristics, discussed in relation to Laughlin’s (1995) classification schema. Pays particular attention to grounded theory assumptions and methods in relation to other interpretive paradigms such as symbolic interactionism, ethnomethodology and hermeneutics. Describes the basic principles and methods of grounded theory research, and presents potential applications to the accounting and management research arenas. Argues that rigorous grounded theory research can offer the accounting and management literatures unique understandings that provide additional perspectives to those already being offered by major schools of thought, and discusses implications of grounded theory for informing contemporary professional practice.

Keywords

Citation

Parker, L.D. and Roffey, B.H. (1997), "Methodological themes: Back to the drawing board: revisiting grounded theory and the everyday accountant’s and manager’s reality", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 212-247. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579710166730

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1997, MCB UP Limited

Related articles