The construction of top management as a good steward: A study of Swedish annual general meetings
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
ISSN: 0951-3574
Article publication date: 18 September 2007
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this paper is to investigate how top management is constructed as a good steward of its company at the annual general meeting (AGM) and how accounting is used in the course of this process.
Design/methodology/approach
To meet these aims the authors attended 36 AGMs of Swedish listed companies. The interactions that occurred at the AGMs were analysed, using the theory of translation.
Findings
One‐third of all questions dealt with financial accounting issues, while the majority of the questions concerned non‐financial aspects of stewardship, i.e. company's efforts regarding environmental, equality and ethical issues.
Research limitations/implications
There is some concern that the complexity of accounting information may make shareholders feel remote from the company. However, AGMs provide a setting where the financial accounts can be complemented with verbal explanations and visual aids. This contextualizes the financial accounts and makes them understandable to an audience that includes many private investors. This contributed to the fact that accounting was discussed, questioned and referred to. Hence, accounting enables the stewardship function of the AGM.
Practical implications
Although AGMs have been the subject of criticism, they are still an important part of the corporate governance system. Since AGMs are live events, shareholders are able to pursue a topic with further questions, an option that is not available to other modes of corporate communication.
Originality/value
Whereas the AGM has been in the foreground in government inquiries and codes of conduct, it has been largely neglected in accounting research.
Keywords
Citation
Carrington, T. and Johed, G. (2007), "The construction of top management as a good steward: A study of Swedish annual general meetings", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 702-728. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570710779018
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2007, Emerald Group Publishing Limited