Methodological controversies in economics and political economy

Abstract

After a clarification of definitions important in methodological discussions, a brief history of early methodological thought in economics and political economy is presented. The development of “orthodox” methodology is traced, and the fundamental assumptions underlying neoclassical economic methodology are enumerated. Philosophical positions – both critical of and sympathetic to the orthodox assumptions – are presented. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of various heterodox positions are surveyed. Throughout the paper, methodological justifications for the emphasis on primarily deductive, complex mathematical models in contemporary economics as practiced in the USA – especially in light of the relevance and importance of primarily verbal, interpretive methodologies in the realm of applied and policy‐oriented economics – are examined.

Citation

Hall, T.W. and Elliott, J.E. (1999), "Methodological controversies in economics and political economy", International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 26 No. 10/11, pp. 1249-1284. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299910292505