To read this content please select one of the options below:

Integrating transformational and participative versus directive leadership theories: Examining intellectual stimulation in male and female leaders across three contexts

Kara A. Arnold (Faculty of Business Administration, Memorial University, St. John's, Canada)
Catherine Loughlin (Sobey School of Business, St. Mary's University, Halifax, Canada)

Leadership & Organization Development Journal

ISSN: 0143-7739

Article publication date: 1 February 2013

12885

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to investigate the extent to which male and female leaders report engaging in participative versus directive intellectually stimulating transformational leadership behaviour across three different contexts (business, government and military).

Design/methodology/approach

Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 64 senior leaders (29 female and 35 male) across Canada.

Findings

Leaders were more likely to describe using a participative versus directive approach to intellectual stimulation. Gender similarities and differences also appeared across contexts: government leaders reported almost twice as many directive examples as business leaders, and men and women in both of these contexts were very similar in their reports about how they enacted intellectual stimulation. In contrast, men and women in the military diverged, with male leaders reporting more participative behaviour than female leaders.

Research limitations/implications

This study extends the leadership literature through an integration of participative and directive leadership theory with transformational leadership theory. Sample size and self‐report data are possible limitations.

Practical implications

Findings provide insight into the behaviours leaders engage in to enhance creative thinking and problem solving within organizations across different contexts and suggests that this aspect of transformational leadership is most likely to be enacted in a participative way by both male and female leaders.

Originality/value

This is one of the first studies to empirically investigate participative versus directive transformational leadership behaviour. Gender differences between contexts are worthy of further study, specifically regarding the implications of these findings for female leaders’ promotion and career progression.

Keywords

Citation

Arnold, K.A. and Loughlin, C. (2013), "Integrating transformational and participative versus directive leadership theories: Examining intellectual stimulation in male and female leaders across three contexts", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731311289974

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles