To read this content please select one of the options below:

Proximate, amino acid, fatty acid and mineral composition of raw and cooked camel (Camelus dromedarius) meat

I.T. Kadim (Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al‐Khoud, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman)
M.R. Al‐Ani (Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al‐Khoud, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman)
R.S. Al‐Maqbaly (Based at the Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al‐Khoud, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman)
M.H. Mansour (Department of Soil, Water and Agricultural Engineering, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al‐Khoud, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman)
O. Mahgoub (Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al‐Khoud, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman)
E.H. Johnson (Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al‐Khoud, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman)

British Food Journal

ISSN: 0007-070X

Article publication date: 19 April 2011

720

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the paper is to study the effects of cooking on proximate composition, amino acids, fatty acids, minerals and total, heme and non‐heme iron content of camel meat.

Design/methodology/approach

A total of ten longissimus thoracis muscles (500 grams) were collected between the tenth and twelfth ribs of the left side. Samples were randomly collected from two to three year old camel carcasses chilled (1‐3°C) for 48 hours then stored at −20°C. The first portion was kept fresh while the second one was placed in plastic bags and cooked by immersion in a water bath at 70°C for 90 minutes. Both samples were freeze‐dried, and then ground to a homogeneous mass to be used for chemical analyses.

Findings

Cooked samples had significantly (p<0.05) higher dry matter by 27.7 per cent, protein by 31.1 per cent and fat by 22.2 per cent, but lower ash content by 8.3 per cent than the raw ones. Cooking had no significant effect on amino acid and fatty acid composition of the meat. The components of camel meat most significantly affected by cooking were macro‐ and micro‐minerals, which ranged between 13.1 and 52.5 per cent, respectively. Cooking resulted in a significant decrease in total, heme and non‐heme iron contents by 4.3, 8.7 and 4.0 per cent, respectively.

Research limitations/implications

The research is restricted to camel meat but it is an exploratory study. The issue of research outcome as only longissimus thoracic muscle is another limitation. Further investigation is needed to include different muscles, temperatures, durations and cooking methods.

Practical implications

Amino acids and fatty acids of camel meat are not affected by cooking, while heating accelerated total and heme iron oxidation suggest camel meat to be a rich source of heme iron.

Originality/value

The paper is original in its findings and useful for both researchers and academics in the field of meat science.

Keywords

Citation

Kadim, I.T., Al‐Ani, M.R., Al‐Maqbaly, R.S., Mansour, M.H., Mahgoub, O. and Johnson, E.H. (2011), "Proximate, amino acid, fatty acid and mineral composition of raw and cooked camel (Camelus dromedarius) meat", British Food Journal, Vol. 113 No. 4, pp. 482-493. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701111123961

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles