Case studies
Teaching cases offers students the opportunity to explore real world challenges in the classroom environment, allowing them to test their assumptions and decision-making skills before taking their knowledge into the workplace.
Prashanth Kumar Sreram and Savitha Chilakamarri
The learning outcomes of this study are as follows:1) illustrate the project management failures that contributed to the fire accident at Grenfell using a fishbone diagram;2…
Abstract
Learning outcomes
The learning outcomes of this study are as follows:
1) illustrate the project management failures that contributed to the fire accident at Grenfell using a fishbone diagram;
2) identify and classify the power and influence of various stakeholders involved in a brownfield project using a relevant framework; and
3) elaborate the need for following effective stakeholder management processes and project leadership, especially in the context of a refurbishment/renovation project.
Case overview/synopsis
On 14th June 2017, the Grenfell Tower in North Kensington, West London, UK, caught fire. The fire raged for 60 h and around 72 people lost their lives. Many criticized the response of the London Fire Brigade (LFB) and their lack of preparedness to respond to such an emergency. There were calls for Dany Cotton, the Chief of LFB, to resign. However, there had been a major cladding-related refurbishment at Grenfell, and subsequent investigations revealed that the use of combustible materials, a lack of compliance with the fire-safety norms and a blatant disregard for resident safety had contributed to the fire. The tragedy was a cumulative outcome of failure on two counts: effective project management and stakeholder management during the process of refurbishment, especially in the context of a low-cost housing project. Given this situation, this case considers whether Dany Cotton should own up to her responsibility and resign from her position. In the process, the case considers Grenfell refurbishment from the theoretical lens of project management in the construction management scenario to understand the factors that could have led to an “avoidable” tragedy.
Complexity academic level
Postgraduate students of construction management; final year undergraduate engineering students who have a foundational course on project management; and architects.
Supplementary materials
Teaching notes are available for educators only.
Subject code
CSS 2: Built environment.
Details
Keywords
Subject
Country
Case length
Case provider
- The CASE Journal
- The Case for Women
- Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals
- Darden Business Publishing Cases
- Emerging Markets Case Studies
- Management School, Fudan University
- Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad
- Kellogg School of Management
- The Case Writing Centre, University of Cape Town, Graduate School of Business